netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 2/2] net: rename sysfs symlinks on device name change

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52D5FC01.2060707@huawei.com>
Date:	Wed, 15 Jan 2014 11:09:53 +0800
From:	Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
To:	Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>
CC:	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>,
	Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 2/2] net: rename sysfs symlinks on device
 name change

On 2014/1/15 10:59, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:50:30AM +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote:
>> On 2014/1/15 4:58, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
> ...snip...
>>> +void netdev_adjacent_rename_links(struct net_device *dev, char *oldname)
>>> +{
>>> +    struct netdev_adjacent *iter;
>>> +
>>> +    list_for_each_entry(iter, &dev->adj_list.upper, list) {
>>> +        netdev_adjacent_sysfs_del(iter->dev, oldname,
>>> +                      &iter->dev->adj_list.lower);
>>> +        netdev_adjacent_sysfs_add(iter->dev, dev,
>>> +                      &iter->dev->adj_list.lower);
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    list_for_each_entry(iter, &dev->adj_list.lower, list) {
>>> +        netdev_adjacent_sysfs_del(iter->dev, oldname,
>>> +                      &iter->dev->adj_list.upper);
>>> +        netdev_adjacent_sysfs_add(iter->dev, dev,
>>> +                      &iter->dev->adj_list.upper);
>>> +    }
>>> +}
>>> +
>>
>> why no all_adj_list, only adj_list?
>>
>> I think you have add the dev to the upper_dev's upper_dev by all_adj_list, and lower_dev, so you have to check them.
> 
> symlinks are created only for neighbour adjacent devices, which are in
> adj_list.*, and are not created for all_adj_list.* devices, which contains
> a 'full view' list of all adjacent devices.
> 

Yes, it return when found adj, I miss it.

>>
>> Regards
>> Ding
>>
>>>  void *netdev_lower_dev_get_private(struct net_device *dev,
>>>                     struct net_device *lower_dev)
>>>  {
>>>
>>
>>
> 
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html