[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1389755839.14001.6.camel@joe-AO722>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 19:17:19 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@...el.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, Mark Rustad <mark.d.rustad@...el.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, gospo@...hat.com, sassmann@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [net-next v4 3/7] ixgbe: Use static inlines instead of macros
On Tue, 2014-01-14 at 18:53 -0800, Aaron Brown wrote:
> From: Mark Rustad <mark.d.rustad@...el.com>
trivia:
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_common.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_common.h
[]
> @@ -124,24 +124,40 @@ s32 ixgbe_reset_pipeline_82599(struct ixgbe_hw *hw);
[]
> -#define IXGBE_WRITE_REG(a, reg, value) writel((value), ((a)->hw_addr + (reg)))
> +static inline void ixgbe_write_reg(struct ixgbe_hw *hw, u32 reg, u32 value)
> +{
> + writel(value, hw->hw_addr + reg);
> +}
> +#define IXGBE_WRITE_REG(a, reg, value) ixgbe_write_reg((a), (reg), (value))
There's no real value in adding parentheses to these macros.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists