[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52DD0A62.9050807@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 12:37:06 +0100
From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
To: Wang Weidong <wangweidong1@...wei.com>
CC: nhorman@...driver.com, davem@...emloft.net, vyasevich@...il.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] sctp: some small clean ups
On 01/20/2014 12:27 PM, Wang Weidong wrote:
> We have the macros in sctp.h, so use them for coding accordance
> in sctp.
Thanks for doing this Wang.
I am actually wondering why we have these macro locking wrappers
and not use these functions directly? Hm, any reasons? Maybe we
should rather go in the other direction with this?
> Wang Weidong (2):
> sctp: use sctp_local_bh_{disable|enable} instead
> local_bh_{disable|enable}
> sctp: use sctp_read_[un]lock instead of read_[un]lock
>
> net/sctp/endpointola.c | 4 ++--
> net/sctp/input.c | 10 +++++-----
> net/sctp/proc.c | 12 ++++++------
> net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c | 8 ++++----
> net/sctp/socket.c | 8 ++++----
> 5 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists