[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52DD1137.8040502@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 20:06:15 +0800
From: Wang Weidong <wangweidong1@...wei.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
CC: <nhorman@...driver.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<vyasevich@...il.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] sctp: some small clean ups
On 2014/1/20 19:37, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 01/20/2014 12:27 PM, Wang Weidong wrote:
>> We have the macros in sctp.h, so use them for coding accordance
>> in sctp.
>
> Thanks for doing this Wang.
>
> I am actually wondering why we have these macro locking wrappers
Here, I didn't found any description about it. In v2.6.12-rc2, the sctp
use these macros.
> and not use these functions directly? Hm, any reasons? Maybe we
> should rather go in the other direction with this?
>
Yeah.
Should I do the other direction for clean ups now?
Regards,
Wang
>> Wang Weidong (2):
>> sctp: use sctp_local_bh_{disable|enable} instead
>> local_bh_{disable|enable}
>> sctp: use sctp_read_[un]lock instead of read_[un]lock
>>
>> net/sctp/endpointola.c | 4 ++--
>> net/sctp/input.c | 10 +++++-----
>> net/sctp/proc.c | 12 ++++++------
>> net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c | 8 ++++----
>> net/sctp/socket.c | 8 ++++----
>> 5 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists