netdev - Re: [PATCH] net/openvswitch: Remove the skb encapsulation mark after decapsulation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 22 Jan 2014 09:02:56 -0800
From:	Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>
To:	Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Joseph Gasparakis <joseph.gasparakis@...el.com>,
	Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/openvswitch: Remove the skb encapsulation mark after decapsulation

On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 7:15 AM, Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com> wrote:
> We must unset the skb encapsulation mark before injecting the
> decapsulated packet into ovs for the rest of its journey.
>
> This follows the practice set by 0afb166 "vxlan: Add capability of Rx
> checksum offload for inner packet" and the overall idea behind the
> skb encapsulation field.
>
> Cc: Joseph Gasparakis <joseph.gasparakis@...el.com>
> Cc: Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>
> Signed-off-by: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>

This should be in the common decapsulation code. It doesn't make sense
to do this here when we set the layer pointers, encap bit, etc. in
common code on transmit.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html