netdev - Re: [patch net-next 6/6] rtnetlink: remove IFLA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140123.144347.115158262468644462.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 23 Jan 2014 14:43:47 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	jiri@...nulli.us
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, fubar@...ibm.com, vfalico@...hat.com,
	andy@...yhouse.net, sfeldma@...ulusnetworks.com,
	stephen@...workplumber.org, vyasevic@...hat.com,
	nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, john.r.fastabend@...el.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next 6/6] rtnetlink: remove IFLA_SLAVES definition

From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 22:33:45 +0100

> Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 09:47:16PM CET, davem@...emloft.net wrote:
>>From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
>>Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 11:43:55 +0100
>>
>>Secondly, you can't remove this, otherwise the next IFLA_* value added
>>here will reuse that old number potentially breaking userland apps.
> 
> This has been in net-next tree for 3 days. It was a mistake, I think
> there is very legit to remove this now, isn't it?

Fair enough, please resend with fixed Subj.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html