lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 13:13:20 +0100 From: Florian Vaussard <florian.vaussard@...l.ch> To: Andreas Larsson <andreas@...sler.com>, Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>, Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com> CC: linux-can@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] can: sja1000: cleanups and new OF property On 02/04/2014 09:19 AM, Andreas Larsson wrote: > On 2014-01-31 14:50, Andreas Larsson wrote: >> On 2014-01-31 14:40, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: >>> On 01/31/2014 02:34 PM, Florian Vaussard wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> (could someone with a SJA1000 on SPARC perform a functional test >>>> to see if interrupts are working? it would be great :-) >>>> >>>> Changes since v2: >>>> - Dropped patch 1 "can: sja1000: remove unused defines" >>>> - Addressed Marc's comments on patch 4 and 6 (now 3 and 5) >>>> >>>> Changes since v1: >>>> - Merge sja1000_of_platform.c into sja1000_platform.c (patch 4) >>>> >>>> The first part of this series performs serveral small cleanups >>>> (patches 1 and 2). >>>> >>>> Patch 3 merges sja1000_of_platform.c into sja1000_platform.c. >>>> Changes are pretty conservatives (mostly copy/paste/move). IRQ >>>> is treated differently in the OF and non-OF versions, thus this >>>> is where the fused version differs the most. >>>> >>>> The final part introduces the 'reg-io-width' binding (already used >>>> by some other drivers) to perform a similar job as what was done >>>> with IORESOURCE_MEM_XXBIT. This is needed on my system to correctly >>>> take into account the aliasing of the address bus. >>>> >>>> All patches were tested using OF boot on my OMAP3 system with a >>>> memory-mapped SJA1000. Thus, the non-OF path is not tested, as >>>> I do not have a platform data at hand. >>> >>> Nice, looks good now. I'll give Andreas some time to test on sparc and >>> then apply the patches. >> >> >> I am on it. I will dig up some hardware for this on Monday to test it. > > Works splendidly. You can add: > > Tested-by: Andreas Larsson <andreas@...sler.com> > Waohhh, great :D Thank you! Regards, Florian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists