netdev - Re: Should I use the pernet stuff for rxrpc sysctls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <25420.1391728330@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date:	Thu, 06 Feb 2014 23:12:10 +0000
From:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:	unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc:	dhowells@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Should I use the pernet stuff for rxrpc sysctls


I also noticed this in net/core/sysctl_net_core.c:

	static struct ctl_table net_core_table[] = {
	#ifdef CONFIG_NET  <---
		{

But isn't the content of the net/core/ directory contingent on CONFIG_NET=y in
net/Makefile, rendering this redundant?

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html