[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <D53252F45158EF44B1DF124FDC9AF2A35AD9E21E@FEYNMAN.fokus.fraunhofer.de>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 19:20:48 +0000
From: "Kretschmer, Mathias" <mathias.kretschmer@...us.fraunhofer.de>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: "arend@...adcom.com" <arend@...adcom.com>,
"sw@...onwunderlich.de" <sw@...onwunderlich.de>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [net-next v2 3/3] cfg80211: add MPLS and 802.21 classification
I see. OK. If that's the proper way to do it, then so be it. The performance hit should be negligible since to 99% it's all the same etherType.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Miller [mailto:davem@...emloft.net]
> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 20:14
> To: Kretschmer, Mathias
> Cc: arend@...adcom.com; sw@...onwunderlich.de;
> netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [net-next v2 3/3] cfg80211: add MPLS and 802.21 classification
>
> From: "Kretschmer, Mathias" <mathias.kretschmer@...us.fraunhofer.de>
> Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 19:11:05 +0000
>
> > Will take a look. Thx. Need to check if there is also a way to set the
> > protocol number when using TX_RINGs, where we use one send() call to
> > signal the kernel that a bunch of frames (with potentially different
> > protocol numbers) is ready for consumption.
>
> You will have to make seperate TX_RING sends() for each cluster where the
> protocol changes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists