[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d3bd3dc1-8e29-4388-bbd3-e4af196d592b@CMEXHTCAS2.ad.emulex.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 10:58:25 +0000
From: Sathya Perla <Sathya.Perla@...lex.Com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
Somnath Kotur <Somnath.Kotur@...lex.Com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Vasundhara Volam <Vasundhara.Volam@...lex.Com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net 4/5] be2net: wait longer to reap TX compls in
be_close()
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Laight [mailto:David.Laight@...LAB.COM]
>
> From: Of Somnath Kotur
> > be_close() currently waits for a max of 200ms to receive all pending
> > TX compls. This timeout value was roughly calcuated based on 10G
> > transmission speeds and the TX queue depth. This timeout may not be
> > enough when the link is operating at lower speeds or in
> > multi-channel/SR-IOV configs with TX-rate limiting setting.
> > Increase the timeout to 2000ms and also bail-out if there is
> > a HW-error.
>
> What about monitoring whether transmits are actually completing,
> and giving up if none are completed within a suitable time period?
>
David, the code already does that. All the queues are checked for
any new TX compls each 1ms in the be_close()->be_tx_compl_clean()
path. This patch is not changing that logic.
thanks,
-Sathya
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists