netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/1] AX88179_178A: Add VID:DID for Lenovo OneLinkDock Gigabit LAN

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <86mwhd7bt1.fsf@hiro.keithp.com>
Date:	Wed, 26 Feb 2014 14:23:54 -0800
From:	Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com>
To:	Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	freddy@...x.com.tw, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] AX88179_178A: Add VID:DID for Lenovo OneLinkDock Gigabit LAN

Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no> writes:

> No, you didn't.  And when I went looking at it now, I see why: It was
> posted to linux-usb and linux-kernel but not to netdev:
> http://www.kernelhub.org/?msg=420289&p=2

I looked in MAINTAINERS and found linux-usb as a suitable address for
drivers/net/usb/. I'm sorry I didn't think to look for drivers/net/ as
well.

> It doesn't matter to me which patch you apply, and I absolutely don't
> think it's my place to tell you which patches to apply or not :-)

Doesn't matter to me either; just want to make sure the device works.

-- 
keith.packard@...el.com

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped