netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/1] AX88179_178A: Add VID:DID for Lenovo OneLinkDock Gigabit LAN

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140226.170225.656093339124352084.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 26 Feb 2014 17:02:25 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	bjorn@...k.no
Cc:	freddy@...x.com.tw, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	keithp@...thp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] AX88179_178A: Add VID:DID for Lenovo OneLinkDock
 Gigabit LAN

From: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 22:44:18 +0100

> David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> writes:
>> From: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
>>
>>> No, sorry for being confusing.  The patch is fine.  But Keith sent it
>>> first...
>>
>> Did I apply Keith's patch?
> 
> No, you didn't.  And when I went looking at it now, I see why: It was
> posted to linux-usb and linux-kernel but not to netdev:
> http://www.kernelhub.org/?msg=420289&p=2
> 
>> If not, should I apply it instead?
> 
> The patches are identical except for the author and a minor difference
> in the device description string. 
> 
> It doesn't matter to me which patch you apply, and I absolutely don't
> think it's my place to tell you which patches to apply or not :-)

Fair enough, I'll apply this one, thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html