netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/1] AX88179_178A: Add VID:DID for Lenovo OneLinkDock Gigabit LAN

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87fvn57dn1.fsf@nemi.mork.no>
Date:	Wed, 26 Feb 2014 22:44:18 +0100
From:	Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	freddy@...x.com.tw, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] AX88179_178A: Add VID:DID for Lenovo OneLinkDock Gigabit LAN

David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> writes:
> From: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
>
>> No, sorry for being confusing.  The patch is fine.  But Keith sent it
>> first...
>
> Did I apply Keith's patch?

No, you didn't.  And when I went looking at it now, I see why: It was
posted to linux-usb and linux-kernel but not to netdev:
http://www.kernelhub.org/?msg=420289&p=2

> If not, should I apply it instead?

The patches are identical except for the author and a minor difference
in the device description string. 

It doesn't matter to me which patch you apply, and I absolutely don't
think it's my place to tell you which patches to apply or not :-)



Bjørn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html