netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/1] AX88179_178A: Add VID:DID for Lenovo OneLinkDock Gigabit LAN

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140226.161659.2024676575146527914.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 26 Feb 2014 16:16:59 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	bjorn@...k.no
Cc:	freddy@...x.com.tw, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] AX88179_178A: Add VID:DID for Lenovo OneLinkDock
 Gigabit LAN

From: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 22:14:10 +0100

> David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> writes:
> 
>> From: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
>> Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 13:13:12 +0100
>>
>>> freddy@...x.com.tw writes:
>>> 
>>>> From: Freddy Xin <freddy@...x.com.tw>
>>>>
>>>> Add VID:DID for Lenovo OneLinkDock Gigabit LAN
>>> 
>>> This is the same patch Keith Packard sent, but with a slighly different
>>> description.  I take that as another proof that we should not attempt to
>>> describe devices in these drivers.  Describe the driver instead.
>>
>> Are you saying that this patch needs to be implemented differently?
> 
> No, sorry for being confusing.  The patch is fine.  But Keith sent it
> first...

Did I apply Keith's patch?  If not, should I apply it instead?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html