netdev - Re: IPv6 routing table max_size badly dimensioned compared to IPv4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140227200523.GA22706@xs.powerdns.com>
Date:	Thu, 27 Feb 2014 21:05:23 +0100
From:	bert hubert <bert.hubert@...herlabs.nl>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: IPv6 routing table max_size badly dimensioned compared to IPv4

On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 11:59:04AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> What kernel version do you use ?

Thanks for the fast reply!

It calls itself "Linux node28 3.0.101-0.15-default #1 SMP Wed Jan 22
15:49:03 UTC 2014 (5c01f4e) x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux"

Which is from "SLES11 SP3". I don't know how to interpret '3.0.101' compared
to 957c665f37007de93ccbe45902a23143724170d0, though.

>From what I see from git HEAD however, the number 4096 is still actually
used for things.

	Bert

> 
> I thought this was already solved.
> 
> Commit 957c665f37007de93ccbe45902a23143724170d0 is in linux 3.0
> ("ipv6: Don't put artificial limit on routing table size.")
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html