[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140306210317.GA9952@kria>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 22:03:17 +0100
From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, hannes@...essinduktion.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipv6: don't set DST_NOCOUNT for remotely added routes
2014-03-06, 15:27:15 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
> Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 17:51:57 +0100
>
> > DST_NOCOUNT should only be used if an authorized user adds routes
> > locally. In case of routes which are added on behalf of router
> > advertisments this flag must not get used as it allows an unlimited
> > number of routes getting added remotely.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
> > Acked-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
> > ---
> >
> > Hannes suggested this for stable
>
> This seems to conflict with the intentions of:
>
> commit a3300ef4bbb1f1e33ff0400e1e6cf7733d988f4f
> Author: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
> Date: Sat Dec 7 03:33:45 2013 +0100
>
> ipv6: don't count addrconf generated routes against gc limit
>
> If not, why not?
These are not the same routes. The commit you mention is for the
routes added to the loopback device in the local table (limited by
max_addresses as the log says).
This patch limits the number of "real" routes that can be added,
which is currently unlimited.
--
Sabrina
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists