netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v4 1/4] ieee802154: add generic header handling routines

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 05 Mar 2014 19:39:13 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...hat.com>
To:	phoebe.buckheister@...m.fraunhofer.de
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-zigbee-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 1/4] ieee802154: add generic header
 handling routines

From: "Phoebe Buckheister" <phoebe.buckheister@...m.fraunhofer.de>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 20:15:56 +0100

> The fc field in struct ieee802154_hdr is a bitfield with many subfields,
> the sc field of struct ieee802154_sec_hdr is also a bitfield. Would it be
> acceptable to represent them as bitfields in the header struct? I expect
> the code to be just as efficient in every respect, but more readable since
> we wouldn't need explicit shifts and masks everywhere.

This is how we handle some fields of struct iphdr, and it's fine with
me.

Be sure to use __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD and __BIG_ENDIAN_BITFIELD for
your CPP checks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html