[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140306054437.GA13676@omega>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 06:44:39 +0100
From: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@...il.com>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
Cc: alex.bluesman.smirnov@...il.com, dbaryshkov@...il.com,
linux-zigbee-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] 6lowpan: reassembly: fix return of init
function
Hi Sergei,
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 01:04:20AM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 03/05/2014 11:43 PM, Alexander Aring wrote:
>
> >This patch adds a missing return after fragmentation init. Otherwise we
> >register a sysctl interface and deregister it afterwards which makes no
> >sense.
>
> >Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@...il.com>
> >---
> > net/ieee802154/reassembly.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> >diff --git a/net/ieee802154/reassembly.c b/net/ieee802154/reassembly.c
> >index 4511fc2..59db7b5 100644
> >--- a/net/ieee802154/reassembly.c
> >+++ b/net/ieee802154/reassembly.c
> >@@ -550,6 +550,8 @@ int __init lowpan_net_frag_init(void)
> > lowpan_frags.frag_expire = lowpan_frag_expire;
> > lowpan_frags.secret_interval = 10 * 60 * HZ;
> > inet_frags_init(&lowpan_frags);
> >+
> >+ return 0;
>
> Perhaps 'goto out' for "consistency" with the code above? (I don't know
> why they used "goto out' in the first place.)
>
ok, thanks, I will remove the "goto out" and will replace it with a
"return 0" if you are fine with that.
- Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists