netdev - Re: [PATCH v7 net-next 1/3] filter: add Extended BPF interpreter and converter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1394388699.20149.105.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:	Sun, 09 Mar 2014 11:11:39 -0700
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@...u.net>,
	Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
	Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>,
	Jovi Zhangwei <jovi.zhangwei@...il.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@....fi>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 net-next 1/3] filter: add Extended BPF interpreter
 and converter

On Sun, 2014-03-09 at 10:38 -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 7:45 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, 2014-03-08 at 15:15 -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> >
> >> +/**
> >> + *   sk_run_filter_ext - run an extended filter
> >> + *   @ctx: buffer to run the filter on
> >> + *   @insn: filter to apply
> >> + *
> >> + * Decode and execute extended BPF instructions.
> >> + * @ctx is the data we are operating on.
> >> + * @filter is the array of filter instructions.
> >> + */
> >> +notrace u32 sk_run_filter_ext(void *ctx, const struct sock_filter_ext *insn)
> >> +{
> >> +     u64 stack[64];
> >> +     u64 regs[16];
> >> +     void *ptr;
> >> +     u64 tmp;
> >> +     int off;
> 
> First of all, great that you finally reviewed it! Feedback is appreciated :)
> 
> > Why is this 'notrace' ?
> 
> to avoid overhead of dummy call.
> JITed filters are not adding this dummy call.
> So 'notrace' on interpreter brings it to parity with JITed filters.

Then its a wrong reason.

At the time we wrote JIT, there was (yet) no support for profiling JIT
from perf tools. I asked for help and nobody answered.

Maybe this has changed, if so, please someone add support.


> 
> > 80 u64 on the stack, that is 640 bytes to run a filter ????
> 
> yes. that was described in commit log and in Doc...filter.txt:
> "
> - 16 4-byte stack slots for register spill-fill replaced with
>   up to 512 bytes of multi-use stack space
> "
> 
> For interpreter it is prohibitive to dynamically allocate stack space
> that's why it just grabs 64*8 to run any program.

Where is checked the max capacity of this stack ?



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html