[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9BBC4E0CF881AA4299206E2E1412B6264FAB61EF@ORSMSX102.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 20:31:07 +0000
From: "Wyborny, Carolyn" <carolyn.wyborny@...el.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: "or.gerlitz@...il.com" <or.gerlitz@...il.com>,
"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
"gospo@...hat.com" <gospo@...hat.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"sassmann@...hat.com" <sassmann@...hat.com>,
"hayja@...l.uc.edu" <hayja@...l.uc.edu>,
"amirv@...lanox.com" <amirv@...lanox.com>,
"yevgenyp@...lanox.com" <yevgenyp@...lanox.com>
Subject: RE: [net-next 05/13] igb: Add support for debugfs
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Miller [mailto:davem@...emloft.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 1:24 PM
> To: Wyborny, Carolyn
> Cc: or.gerlitz@...il.com; Kirsher, Jeffrey T; gospo@...hat.com;
> netdev@...r.kernel.org; sassmann@...hat.com; hayja@...l.uc.edu;
> amirv@...lanox.com; yevgenyp@...lanox.com
> Subject: Re: [net-next 05/13] igb: Add support for debugfs
>
> From: "Wyborny, Carolyn" <carolyn.wyborny@...el.com>
> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 20:13:53 +0000
>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: David Miller [mailto:davem@...emloft.net]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 12:47 PM
> >> To: Wyborny, Carolyn
> >> Cc: or.gerlitz@...il.com; Kirsher, Jeffrey T; gospo@...hat.com;
> >> netdev@...r.kernel.org; sassmann@...hat.com; hayja@...l.uc.edu;
> >> amirv@...lanox.com; yevgenyp@...lanox.com
> >> Subject: Re: [net-next 05/13] igb: Add support for debugfs
> >>
> >> From: "Wyborny, Carolyn" <carolyn.wyborny@...el.com>
> >> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 16:35:49 +0000
> >>
> >> > Josh and I tried very hard to not reimplement anything already
> >> > available in some other tool or mechanism and used the examples we
> >> > already have for this in our other drivers. That being said, we'll
> >> > abide and follow any clear criteria provided.
> >>
> >> I don't think what's being done here is appropriate.
> >>
> >> ethtool can provide the extended statistics.
> >>
> >> We already have a way to dump registers in ethtool as well. If you
> >> want to add fine-grained register read support and write support,
> >> that would be a nice addition to ethtool.
> >
> > Ok, I'll remove the register outputs. Is there any objection to the other
> functionality provided?
>
> I said the statistics can be done with ethtool, so I object to everything.
Understood. Withdrawing patchset. Will take suggestion for ethtool work.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists