netdev - Re: [PATCH net] ipv6: fix RTNL assert fail in DAD

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140319.235217.1348886613951521818.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 19 Mar 2014 23:52:17 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	hannes@...essinduktion.org
Cc:	stephen@...workplumber.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipv6: fix RTNL assert fail in DAD

From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 23:44:42 +0100

> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 01:53:19PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
>> Ok, the timer stuff could run from a workqueue just fine.
> 
> We have no-timer invocations, too, like addrconf_prefix_rcv. In that case the
> whole handling of the router advertisment should get deferred into the
> workqueue.

Just to be clear, you are saying that this doesn't need to be
synchronous?  Handling a prefix event seems like something that would
in fact need to be.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html