[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140326175018.GA24065@zed>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 19:50:18 +0200
From: Mike Rapoport <mike.rapoport@...ellosystems.com>
To: David Stevens <dlstevens@...ibm.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Or Gerlitz <or.gerlitz@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: vxlan: fix crash when interface is created with
no group
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 08:47:19AM -0600, David Stevens wrote:
> Mike Rapoport <mike.rapoport@...ellosystems.com> wrote on 03/26/2014 05:47:54 AM:
>
> >
> > It fixes the instant crashes occurring when vxlan interface goes up, but
> > I have other crashes with custom vxlan configuration, e.g. in the
> > following scenario:
> >
> > Node A:
> > $ ip link add vxlan1 type vxlan id 1 dev ethA
> > $ ip addr add dev vxlan1 10.0.0.1/24
> > $ ip link set up dev vxlan1
> > $ bridge fdb append 00:00:00:00:00:00 dev vxlan1 dst <ethB IPv4 address>
>
> I thought this MAC address would be an error, but I just noticed that you
> submitted a patch adding interpretation of the all zeroes MAC address as
> a default FDB.
>
> That patch, IMO, should've either not gone in, or should've replaced (entirely)
> the existing default_dst. I think the problems you are seeing are due to having
> two "defaults".
>
> Since the existing default_dst could be either a multicast group or a specific
> destination, I don't understand the point of your patch:
> afbd8bae9c798c5cdbe4439d3a50536b5438247c
>
> except possibly to support it as a list. In that case, at least that patch should've
> removed default_dst and used the all-zeroes fdb entry instead, including group
> joins and leaves when it is a multicast IP address.
>
> I certainly don't see the point of having both.
The idea was to have a list of multiple destinations allow a weird form
of multicast when infrastructure does not support it.
I don't remember now why I didn't follow your advice about removing
default_dst then (1). Maybe I had some thoughts that seemed smart and
maybe it was just lazines.
And now I definitely regret :)
The problem is not only duplication of default destinations, but also
the mis^Wuse of default_dst to distinguish whether IPv4 or IPv6 path
should be taken because there is no explicit specification of the
protocol if neither IFLA_VXLAN_GROUP or IFLA_VXLAN_LOCAL defined at
vxlan_newlink. Moreover, if neither of these attributes is present, the
custom configuration will always use v4 socket regardles of use of
default_dst or fdb entry.
> +-DLS
>
--
[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/270969/focus=271830
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists