netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: unix: non blocking recvmsg() should not return -EINTR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <53341E3D.1010803@mojatatu.com>
Date:	Thu, 27 Mar 2014 08:49:01 -0400
From:	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
To:	Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@...ileactivedefense.com>,
	David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
CC:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: unix: non blocking recvmsg() should not return -EINTR

On 03/27/14 08:40, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
> David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM> writes:
>
> I'm find with any behaviour which does not restore the original 'lost
> wakeup' bug and considering that "it is a standard procedure to harras
> people who are so careless to contribute bug fixes to Linux until the
> cow comes home and they'd better be quiet about that!", as Mr Eric
> "/dev/null" Dumasomething explained, I certainly don't plan to turn this
> conviction of mine into a proper patch.

I think anything you say past this point nobody is listening.
You may actually have something of value to say but the passive
aggressiveness is going to bite your ass.

cheers,
jamal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html