[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <885249016.20140327135218@eikelenboom.it>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 13:52:18 +0100
From: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@...elenboom.it>
To: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@...rix.com>
CC: xen-devel@...ts.xen.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/3] xen-netback: remove pointless clause from if statement
Thursday, March 27, 2014, 1:23:06 PM, you wrote:
> This patch removes a test in start_new_rx_buffer() that checks whether
> a copy operation is less than MAX_BUFFER_OFFSET in length, since
> MAX_BUFFER_OFFSET is defined to be PAGE_SIZE and the only caller of
> start_new_rx_buffer() already limits copy operations to PAGE_SIZE or less.
> Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@...rix.com>
> Cc: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>
> Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>
> Cc: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@...elenboom.it>
> ---
> drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
> index 438d0c0..befc413 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
> @@ -192,8 +192,7 @@ static bool start_new_rx_buffer(int offset, unsigned long size, int head)
> * into multiple copies tend to give large frags their
> * own buffers as before.
> */
> - if ((offset + size > MAX_BUFFER_OFFSET) &&
> - (size <= MAX_BUFFER_OFFSET) && offset && !head)
> + if ((offset + size > MAX_BUFFER_OFFSET) && offset && !head)
> return true;
>
> return false;
Will put this through the test now ..
--
Sander
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists