lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140329.185252.1161118508682129633.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Sat, 29 Mar 2014 18:52:52 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	Ian.Campbell@...rix.com
Cc:	linux@...elenboom.it, paul.durrant@...rix.com,
	xen-devel@...ts.xen.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	wei.liu2@...rix.com
Subject: Re: For 3.14 [PATCH v3 net 1/3] xen-netback: remove pointless
 clause from if statement

From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 12:58:47 +0000

> On Fri, 2014-03-28 at 13:45 +0100, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> Friday, March 28, 2014, 12:39:05 PM, you wrote:
>> 
>> > This patch removes a test in start_new_rx_buffer() that checks whether
>> > a copy operation is less than MAX_BUFFER_OFFSET in length, since
>> > MAX_BUFFER_OFFSET is defined to be PAGE_SIZE and the only caller of
>> > start_new_rx_buffer() already limits copy operations to PAGE_SIZE or less.
>> 
>> > Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@...rix.com>
>> > Cc: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>
>> > Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>
>> > Cc: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@...elenboom.it>
>> > ---
>> >  drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c |    4 ++--
>> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> 
>> > diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
>> > index 438d0c0..72314c7 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
>> > @@ -192,8 +192,8 @@ static bool start_new_rx_buffer(int offset, unsigned long size, int head)
>> >          * into multiple copies tend to give large frags their
>> >          * own buffers as before.
>> >          */
>> > -       if ((offset + size > MAX_BUFFER_OFFSET) &&
>> > -           (size <= MAX_BUFFER_OFFSET) && offset && !head)
>> > +       BUG_ON(size > MAX_BUFFER_OFFSET);
>> > +       if ((offset + size > MAX_BUFFER_OFFSET) && offset && !head)
>> >                 return true;
>> >  
>> >         return false;
>> 
>> For the whole v3 series:
>> 
>> Reported-By: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@...elenboom.it>
>> Tested-By: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@...elenboom.it>
>> 
>> CC'ed Dave to get his attention since this is a last minute for 3.14.
> 
> All three patches: Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>

Ok, we're coming down to the wire so this might not make it, but
I'll queue it up for -stable and get it merged when I can.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ