[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1396284040.29410.60.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 09:40:40 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>
Cc: Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>,
Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Maciej Zenczykowski <maze@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] bonding: Initialize the ALB work queue for lb mode
only.
On Mon, 2014-03-31 at 09:27 -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 2014-03-28 at 22:29 -0700, Mahesh Bandewar wrote:
> >> micro change to initialize / cancel the ALB work queue only
> >> if the mode selected is ALB or TLB.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>
> >> ---
> >
> >Can the mode of a bonding device be dynamically changed ?
>
> No. The mode can only be changed when there are no slaves in
> the bond, and the bond is administratively down.
I don't see why this patch is needed.
What about mii_work, arp_work ?
There is no cost calling INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&bond->alb_work,
bond_alb_monitor) and cancel_delayed_work_sync(&bond->alb_work)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists