[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpXkmU9qw_KPeMPnE0KGbcCWo5R=Le7HsizyiuRJVkKshA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 14:50:09 -0700
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>,
Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch net] ipv4: fib: check forwarding before checking send_redirects
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 2:23 PM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
> Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 14:17:08 -0700
>
>> We are not supposed even to execute __fib_validate_source() in such
>> case, are we? :)
>
> Yes, we used to, every time we'd make a routing cache entry, we'd
> execute this code.
>
> Check fib_validate_source() from before the routing cache removal if
> you don't believe me.
>
> That check you are editing was added by myself as an optimization
> that was necessary after the routing cache removal since this
> function performs two FIB table lookups every time it is called.
I must miss something here. Looking at the code:
int r = secpath_exists(skb) ? 0 : IN_DEV_RPFILTER(idev);
if (!r && !fib_num_tclassid_users(dev_net(dev)) &&
(dev->ifindex != oif || !IN_DEV_TX_REDIRECTS(idev))) {
*itag = 0;
return 0;
}
r == 0 is true in our case since we disable rp_filter manually.
And fib_num_tclassid_users() == 0 by default too.
Therefore, the only thing takes effect is if dev->ifindex == oif.
Given the fact that disabling send_redirects makes the problem
disappear, dev->ifindex != oif must be false, otherwise it doesn't
even need to check TX_REDIRECTS.
The rx interface is loopback, so skb->dev == lo, and the oif we pass
here must be LOOPBACK_IFINDEX, therefore the following code
in ip_route_input_slow():
if (res.type == RTN_LOCAL) {
err = fib_validate_source(skb, saddr, daddr, tos,
LOOPBACK_IFINDEX,
dev, in_dev, &itag);
if (err < 0)
goto martian_source_keep_err;
goto local_input;
}
which looks good to me too, since the packet has src addr == dst addr.
Which part am I missing?
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists