netdev - Re: [PATCH] staging: r8723au: Fix build warnings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140409163735.GC16346@kroah.com>
Date:	Wed, 9 Apr 2014 09:37:35 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@...hat.com>, kbuild-all@...org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: r8723au: Fix build warnings

On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 10:05:20AM -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> The kbuild test robot reports the following:
> 
> tree:   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> head:   75ff24fa52f0cc512ceee4c377632b91a3a80811
> commit: 9176303c404741b2f96796466437f2badf6e289b staging: r8723au: Turn on build of new driver
> date:   4 days ago
> config: make ARCH=avr32 allyesconfig
> 
> All warnings:
> 
> >> drivers/staging/rtl8723au/include/rtw_mlme.h:620: warning: 'rtw_set_roaming' declared inline after being called
>    drivers/staging/rtl8723au/include/rtw_mlme.h:620: warning: previous declaration of 'rtw_set_roaming' was here
> >> drivers/staging/rtl8723au/include/rtw_mlme.h:621: warning: 'rtw_to_roaming' declared inline after being called
>    drivers/staging/rtl8723au/include/rtw_mlme.h:621: warning: previous declaration of 'rtw_to_roaming' was here
> --
>    drivers/staging/rtl8723au/hal/rtl8723a_hal_init.c: In function 'Hal_EEValueCheck':
> >> drivers/staging/rtl8723au/hal/rtl8723a_hal_init.c:2277: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type
> 
> The first two warnings are fixed by making the two prototypes be "inline" to match
> the actual routine. The third warning comes from testing that a u8 quantity is positive.

If the functions are inline, why are they referenced in a .h file at
all?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html