[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ae24ae5c6ea45c399e7be03c69dc442@BY2PR03MB299.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 18:08:47 +0000
From: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
"olaf@...fle.de" <olaf@...fle.de>,
"apw@...onical.com" <apw@...onical.com>,
"jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net 3/3] Drivers: net: hyperv: Address UDP checksum
issues
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Miller [mailto:davem@...emloft.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 9, 2014 10:01 AM
> To: KY Srinivasan
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> devel@...uxdriverproject.org; olaf@...fle.de; apw@...onical.com;
> jasowang@...hat.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net 3/3] Drivers: net: hyperv: Address UDP checksum
> issues
>
> From: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>
> Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 12:46:11 -0700
>
> > } else if (net_trans_info & INFO_UDP) {
> > - csum_info->transmit.udp_checksum = 1;
> > + /* UDP checksum offload is not supported on ws2008r2.
> > + * Furthermore, on ws2012 and ws2012r2, there are some
> > + * issues with udp checksum offload from Linux guests.
> > + * (these are host issues).
> > + * For now compute the checksum here.
> > + */
> > + struct udphdr *uh = udp_hdr(skb);
> > + u16 udp_len = ntohs(uh->len);
> > +
> > + uh->check = 0;
> > + uh->check = csum_tcpudp_magic(ip_hdr(skb)->saddr,
> > + ip_hdr(skb)->daddr,
> > + udp_len, IPPROTO_UDP,
> > + csum_partial(uh, udp_len, 0));
> > + if (uh->check == 0)
> > + uh->check = CSUM_MANGLED_0;
> > +
> > + csum_info->transmit.udp_checksum = 0;
>
> You absolutely cannot mangle packet header contents without first COW'ing
> the SKB to make sure it's writable.
>
> Otherwise network taps like tcpdump, and any other entity with a reference
> to the packet, can see inconsistent state.
Thanks Dave. I will COW the SKB before changing the checksum value. I do have a question though.
I looked at a bunch of hardware drivers and they modify the header information, specially checksum
field and I could not see where they had COWed the skb. I was grepping for skb_cow in these drivers.
Regards,
K. Y
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists