netdev - Re: [PATCHv3 0/5] net: rfkill: gpio: cleanup and a few new acpi ids

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 11 Apr 2014 09:26:13 +0200
From:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
Cc:	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
	Rhyland Klein <rklein@...dia.com>,
	Marc Dietrich <marvin24@....de>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 0/5] net: rfkill: gpio: cleanup and a few new acpi ids

On Wed, 2014-04-09 at 09:32 -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:

> > Stephen! Are you expecting any changes to board-paz00.c in this kernel
> > cycle? If not, I think it would be easiest if Johannes, you take the
> > whole set. What do you guys think?
> 
> I can't predict the future, but the chances are pretty slim - that file
> is pretty tiny and doesn't have much churn.
> 
> The best approach is to put this series in its own topic branch. Then,
> if any conflict does come up, I can simply merge the branch into the
> Tegra treee and apply the conflicting patches on top.

Ok, I'll do that. Shout now if you don't want these patches merged :)

johannes

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html