netdev - Re: [PATCH net] net: filter: initialize A and X registers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1398260344.29914.9.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:	Wed, 23 Apr 2014 06:39:04 -0700
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, ast@...mgrid.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: filter: initialize A and X registers

On Wed, 2014-04-23 at 13:45 +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 04/23/2014 07:13 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >
> > David, is it possible for you to push net-next tree ?
> 
> I think this would need to go into net tree first and then
> for the upcoming changes, net would need to be merged into
> net-next. This will create a minor merge conflict with the
> BPF prandom extension; fix is to remove the defines near
> __get_random_u32(), as they will be above __sk_run_filter()
> already.

My suggestion to push net-next was not related to the bpf patch.

I needed net-next being fresh for a backport into Google kernels.

Thanks


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html