[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201404242329.FBF00065.OOQtHFMOLFSVFJ@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 23:29:08 +0900
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: paul@...l-moore.com
Cc: casey@...aufler-ca.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: xfrm: Can "struct netlbl_audit" be killed?
Paul Moore wrote:
> On Thursday, April 24, 2014 08:51:35 PM Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > Hello, Casey and Paul.
> >
> > At the ipsec-next tree,
> >
> > /* Audit Information */
> > struct xfrm_audit {
> > u32 secid;
> > kuid_t loginuid;
> > unsigned int sessionid;
> > };
> >
> > has just been killed
> > (
> > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/klassert/ipsec-next.git/commit
> > /?id=f1370cc4a01e61007ab3020c761cef6b88ae3729 and
> > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/klassert/ipsec-next.git/commit
> > /?id=2e71029e2c32ecd59a2e8f351517bfbbad42ac11 ) because these arguments are
> > always calculated from current thread's security context.
>
> Before we go to far, is it always true for AF_KEY that "current" is set to the
> sending process? If the answer is no, I think we have a problem.
Speak of "struct xfrm_audit", I think the answer is yes, or commit ab5f5e8b
"[XFRM]: xfrm audit calls" is wrong.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists