[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1398474927.29914.100.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 18:15:27 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Cc: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devel@...uxdriverproject.org, olaf@...fle.de, apw@...onical.com,
jasowang@...hat.com, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] hyperv: Properly handle checksum offload
On Fri, 2014-04-25 at 17:43 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Apr 2014 11:45:14 -0700
> "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com> wrote:
>
> > @@ -474,6 +477,9 @@ static int netvsc_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *net)
> > csum_info = (struct ndis_tcp_ip_checksum_info *)((void *)ppi +
> > ppi->ppi_offset);
> >
> > + ip_hdr(skb)->check = 0;
> > + csum_info->transmit.ip_header_checksum = 1;
> > +
> > if (net_trans_info & (INFO_IPV4 << 16))
> > csum_info->transmit.is_ipv4 = 1;
> > else
>
> Linux doesn't need or want IP checksum offload.
> It will not have any performance gain.
BTW, was this patch even tested with IPv6 packets ???
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists