[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <002f01cf6a5b$a92e3660$fb8aa320$%an@samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 10:20:12 +0900
From: Byungho An <bh74.an@...sung.com>
To: 'Florian Fainelli' <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: 'netdev' <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
'David Miller' <davem@...emloft.net>,
"'ks.giri'" <ks.giri@...sung.com>,
"'vipul.pandya'" <vipul.pandya@...sung.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] net: sxgbe: Added tail point update
Florian Fainelli wrote:
> 2014-05-07 1:14 GMT-07:00 Byungho An <bh74.an@...sung.com>:
> >
> > This patch adds tail point update function for rx path
> > after rx_refill function. It indicates tail point for rx dma.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Byungho An <bh74.an@...sung.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ethernet/samsung/sxgbe/sxgbe_dma.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
> > drivers/net/ethernet/samsung/sxgbe/sxgbe_dma.h | 4 ++++
> > drivers/net/ethernet/samsung/sxgbe/sxgbe_main.c | 5 +++++
> > 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/samsung/sxgbe/sxgbe_dma.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/samsung/sxgbe/sxgbe_dma.c
> > index 49240c9..249b0e0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/samsung/sxgbe/sxgbe_dma.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/samsung/sxgbe/sxgbe_dma.c
> > @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ static void sxgbe_dma_channel_init(void __iomem
> *ioaddr, int cha_num,
> >
> > dma_addr = dma_rx + ((r_rsize - 1) * SXGBE_DESC_SIZE_BYTES);
> > writel(lower_32_bits(dma_addr),
> > - ioaddr + SXGBE_DMA_CHA_RXDESC_LADD_REG(cha_num));
> > + ioaddr + SXGBE_DMA_CHA_RXDESC_TAILPTR_REG(cha_num));
> > /* program the ring sizes */
> > writel(t_rsize - 1, ioaddr +
> SXGBE_DMA_CHA_TXDESC_RINGLEN_REG(cha_num));
> > writel(r_rsize - 1, ioaddr +
> SXGBE_DMA_CHA_RXDESC_RINGLEN_REG(cha_num));
> > @@ -370,6 +370,17 @@ static void sxgbe_enable_tso(void __iomem *ioaddr,
> u8 chan_num)
> > writel(ctrl, ioaddr + SXGBE_DMA_CHA_TXCTL_REG(chan_num));
> > }
> >
> > +static void sxgbe_dma_update_rxdesc_tail_ptr(void __iomem *ioaddr, u8
> chan_num,
> > + dma_addr_t dma_rx_phy, int cur_rx,
> > + int rxsize)
>
> I think that at some point you should revisit your abstraction, all
> the patches that I see do take a void __iomem * argument as the first
> function argument, you should probably use your driver private context
> here. The day you support a different version of the hardware, there
> might be other differences that need to be taken care of.
>
I agree with you, it would be more robust for different version of the hardware and make simple function argument.
But most functions of this driver deal with read/write register using ioaddr.
As of now I think it is enough but I'll consider it later.
[snip]
>
>
> --
> Florian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists