[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGVrzcaic-rrbRg2CpvzpyTpt0iRtX9=QE8WLpR3Eep=8w5czQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 12:09:07 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Byungho An <bh74.an@...sung.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"ks.giri" <ks.giri@...sung.com>,
"vipul.pandya" <vipul.pandya@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: sxgbe: Added tail point update
2014-05-07 1:14 GMT-07:00 Byungho An <bh74.an@...sung.com>:
>
> This patch adds tail point update function for rx path
> after rx_refill function. It indicates tail point for rx dma.
>
> Signed-off-by: Byungho An <bh74.an@...sung.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/samsung/sxgbe/sxgbe_dma.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
> drivers/net/ethernet/samsung/sxgbe/sxgbe_dma.h | 4 ++++
> drivers/net/ethernet/samsung/sxgbe/sxgbe_main.c | 5 +++++
> 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/samsung/sxgbe/sxgbe_dma.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/samsung/sxgbe/sxgbe_dma.c
> index 49240c9..249b0e0 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/samsung/sxgbe/sxgbe_dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/samsung/sxgbe/sxgbe_dma.c
> @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ static void sxgbe_dma_channel_init(void __iomem *ioaddr, int cha_num,
>
> dma_addr = dma_rx + ((r_rsize - 1) * SXGBE_DESC_SIZE_BYTES);
> writel(lower_32_bits(dma_addr),
> - ioaddr + SXGBE_DMA_CHA_RXDESC_LADD_REG(cha_num));
> + ioaddr + SXGBE_DMA_CHA_RXDESC_TAILPTR_REG(cha_num));
> /* program the ring sizes */
> writel(t_rsize - 1, ioaddr + SXGBE_DMA_CHA_TXDESC_RINGLEN_REG(cha_num));
> writel(r_rsize - 1, ioaddr + SXGBE_DMA_CHA_RXDESC_RINGLEN_REG(cha_num));
> @@ -370,6 +370,17 @@ static void sxgbe_enable_tso(void __iomem *ioaddr, u8 chan_num)
> writel(ctrl, ioaddr + SXGBE_DMA_CHA_TXCTL_REG(chan_num));
> }
>
> +static void sxgbe_dma_update_rxdesc_tail_ptr(void __iomem *ioaddr, u8 chan_num,
> + dma_addr_t dma_rx_phy, int cur_rx,
> + int rxsize)
I think that at some point you should revisit your abstraction, all
the patches that I see do take a void __iomem * argument as the first
function argument, you should probably use your driver private context
here. The day you support a different version of the hardware, there
might be other differences that need to be taken care of.
> +{
> + u32 reg_val;
> +
> + reg_val = (dma_rx_phy & 0xFFFFFFFF) + ((cur_rx % rxsize) *
> + SXGBE_DESC_SIZE_BYTES);
> + writel(reg_val, ioaddr + SXGBE_DMA_CHA_RXDESC_TAILPTR_REG(chan_num));
> +}
> +
> static const struct sxgbe_dma_ops sxgbe_dma_ops = {
> .init = sxgbe_dma_init,
> .cha_init = sxgbe_dma_channel_init,
> @@ -386,6 +397,7 @@ static const struct sxgbe_dma_ops sxgbe_dma_ops = {
> .rx_dma_int_status = sxgbe_rx_dma_int_status,
> .rx_watchdog = sxgbe_dma_rx_watchdog,
> .enable_tso = sxgbe_enable_tso,
> + .update_rxdesc_tail_ptr = sxgbe_dma_update_rxdesc_tail_ptr,
> };
>
> const struct sxgbe_dma_ops *sxgbe_get_dma_ops(void)
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/samsung/sxgbe/sxgbe_dma.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/samsung/sxgbe/sxgbe_dma.h
> index 843fa9b..a06e01e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/samsung/sxgbe/sxgbe_dma.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/samsung/sxgbe/sxgbe_dma.h
> @@ -43,6 +43,10 @@ struct sxgbe_dma_ops {
> void (*rx_watchdog)(void __iomem *ioaddr, u32 riwt);
> /* Enable TSO for each DMA channel */
> void (*enable_tso)(void __iomem *ioaddr, u8 chan_num);
> + void (*update_rxdesc_tail_ptr)(void __iomem *ioaddr, u8 chan_num,
> + dma_addr_t dma_rx, int r_rentry,
> + int r_rsize);
> +
> };
>
> const struct sxgbe_dma_ops *sxgbe_get_dma_ops(void);
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/samsung/sxgbe/sxgbe_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/samsung/sxgbe/sxgbe_main.c
> index 93bf151..7dc3449 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/samsung/sxgbe/sxgbe_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/samsung/sxgbe/sxgbe_main.c
> @@ -1521,6 +1521,7 @@ static int sxgbe_rx(struct sxgbe_priv_data *priv, int limit)
> skb_put(skb, frame_len);
>
> skb->ip_summed = checksum;
> + skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, priv->dev);
> if (checksum == CHECKSUM_NONE)
> netif_receive_skb(skb);
> else
> @@ -1530,6 +1531,10 @@ static int sxgbe_rx(struct sxgbe_priv_data *priv, int limit)
> }
>
> sxgbe_rx_refill(priv);
> + priv->hw->dma->update_rxdesc_tail_ptr(priv->ioaddr, qnum,
> + priv->rxq[qnum]->dma_rx_phy,
> + priv->rxq[qnum]->cur_rx,
> + priv->dma_rx_size);
>
> return count;
> }
> --
> 1.7.10.4
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Florian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists