netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/3] Make mark-based routing work better with multiple separate networks.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr1ey0j03OtO3_tD+AREQwnk1J9Mx60-TcEP9QwEy4tdAw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 13 May 2014 04:58:21 +0900
From:	Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@...gle.com>
To:	sowmini varadhan <sowmini05@...il.com>
Cc:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, JP Abgrall <jpa@...gle.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>,
	Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Make mark-based routing work better with multiple
 separate networks.

On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 9:21 PM, sowmini varadhan <sowmini05@...il.com> wrote:
> what is the relationship
> between this proposal and the current linux vrf implementation

I'm not sure what you mean by VRF implementation, do you have a
pointer to the code?

> (which afaik is done using network namespaces)?

Socket marking is a per-socket operation, and a given process may have
many sockets with many different marks. I don't think it's possible to
do this using namespaces, because AFAIK a process can only be in one
namespace.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html