[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACP96tQO8PWyOKxR5gWWx4VvjjcTmkLhGHr_P2-WBCDEJpqL8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 17:09:42 -0400
From: sowmini varadhan <sowmini05@...il.com>
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@...gle.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, JP Abgrall <jpa@...gle.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Make mark-based routing work better with multiple
separate networks.
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@...gle.com> wrote:
> I'm not sure what you mean by VRF implementation, do you have a
> pointer to the code?
>
>> (which afaik is done using network namespaces)?
See http://lists.openvz.org/pipermail/devel/2008-October/015055.html
I'm not sure what the current status of the patch is ( perhaps someone on
this list can comment? I thought this had been merged into kernel.git
at some point, but evidently not so?) but after
http://lwn.net/Articles/407495/, a single
process should be able to open sockes in different namespaces.
> Socket marking is a per-socket operation, and a given process may have
> many sockets with many different marks. I don't think it's possible to
> do this using namespaces, because AFAIK a process can only be in one
> namespace.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists