[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53759CE7.8000207@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 13:06:47 +0800
From: Duan Jiong <duanj.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <kaber@...sh.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ip_tunnel: don't add tunnel twice
于 2014年05月16日 11:10, David Miller 写道:
> From: Duan Jiong <duanj.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
> Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 13:07:02 +0800
>
>>
>> When using command "ip tunnel add" to add a tunnel, the tunnel will be added twice,
>> through ip_tunnel_create() and ip_tunnel_update().
>>
>> Because the second is unnecessary, so we can just break after adding tunnel
>> through ip_tunnel_create().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Duan Jiong <duanj.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
>
> ip_tunnel_update() seems to do some things tha ip_tunnel_create()
> does not.
>
> For example, setting dev->dev_addr[] and dev->broadcast[] from the
> ipv4 parms if appropriate.
>
> I think you need to rethink this change.
When registering tunnel link, function register_netdevice() will call
dev->netdev_ops->ndo_init, actually the virtual function ndo_init will
do some same things the ip_tunnel_update() does, such as the
above you mentioned.
So i think you don't need to worry about that.
Thanks,
Duan
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists