netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] pktgen: Use seq_puts() where seq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 16 May 2014 16:23:46 +0100
From:	Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
To:	David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Cc:	'Alexei Starovoitov' <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] pktgen: Use seq_puts() where seq_printf() is
 not needed

On 05/16/14 at 03:08pm, David Laight wrote:
> From: Alexei Starovoitov
> > > -       seq_printf(seq, "dst_mac: ");
> > > +       seq_puts(seq, "dst_mac: ");
> > 
> > tough luck of kernel developers... ;)
> > Normal printf() GCC optimizes into puts() automatically.
> 
> Yes - a PITA when you are compiling for an embedded system
> with a very limited 'libc'.
> 
> Unless I was actually worried about the execution time I'd
> leave them as seq_printf() for consistency through the function.

pktgen already used seq_puts() in various places but not
consistently. Now it does. Besides that, checkpatch.pl specifically
complained about the use of seq_printf() on non format strings.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html