lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEP_g=9At8jhM2ym31YeWaC9u6_O-Sq1igpER3TuYXj=KXTJNg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 21 May 2014 13:31:55 -0700
From:	Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>
To:	Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
Cc:	"dev@...nvswitch.org" <dev@...nvswitch.org>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>,
	Ben Pfaff <blp@...ira.com>, Ravi K <rkerur@...il.com>,
	Joe Stringer <joe@...d.net.nz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2.57] datapath: Add basic MPLS support to kernel

On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 8:31 AM, Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au> wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 07:30:38PM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
>> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au> wrote:
>> > diff --git a/datapath/linux/compat/include/linux/netdevice.h b/datapath/linux/compat/include/linux/netdevice.h
>> > index d726390..0381002 100644
>> > --- a/datapath/linux/compat/include/linux/netdevice.h
>> > +++ b/datapath/linux/compat/include/linux/netdevice.h
>> > +#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,38)
>> >  #define netif_skb_features rpl_netif_skb_features
>> >  netdev_features_t rpl_netif_skb_features(struct sk_buff *skb);
>>
>> Currently this function doesn't look at mpls_features. Should it for
>> things other than TSO?
>
> It seems to me that rpl_netif_skb_features is only used by
> rpl_dev_queue_xmit().
>
> If that is the case then I don't think it is necessary to examine
> mpls_features, which was introduced in v3.11, as rpl_dev_queue_xmit()
> only exists for older kernel versions.

Sorry, I actually meant for upstream. I agree that the compatibility
code reflects current kernels as written.

It seems like the checks in dev_hard_start_xmit() won't take
mpls_features (or the presence of MPLS) into account when deciding
whether to emulate the offload or pass the skb directly to the NIC. In
the GSO code itself, we look at mpls_features but if we never get
there then it will be too late.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ