[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <538052A2.1060700@broadcom.com>
Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 01:04:50 -0700
From: Prashant <prashant@...adcom.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <mchan@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tg3: Override clock, link aware and link idle
mode during NVRAM dump
On 5/23/2014 9:17 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Prashant Sreedharan <prashant@...adcom.com>
> Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 09:54:44 -0700
>
>> + if (cpmu_val & (CPMU_CTRL_LINK_AWARE_MODE |
>> + CPMU_CTRL_LINK_IDLE_MODE)) {
>> +
>
> Please remove this empty line.
Ok
>
>> + tw32(TG3_CPMU_CTRL, cpmu_val &
>> + ~(CPMU_CTRL_LINK_AWARE_MODE |
>> + CPMU_CTRL_LINK_IDLE_MODE));
>
> This is not indented correctly.
>
> The ~() expression is part of the "cpum_val &", it's not
> another separate argument to tw32().
>
> Therefore ~() should be indented to the column cpum_val starts
> at.
>
Will fix indentation.
>> + if (need_resched()) {
>> + if (signal_pending(current)) {
>> + eeprom->len += i;
>> + ret = -EINTR;
>> + goto eeprom_done;
>
> Why are you incrementing eeprom->len when you break out of the
> loop due to a signal? You didn't read that extra byte.
>
eeprom->len is discarded by caller if a failure is returned.
I will resend the patch after incorporating comments and add your
Reviewed-by. Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists