netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/1] iproute2 bridge: bring to par with brctl show macs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5385070F.1030802@mojatatu.com>
Date:	Tue, 27 May 2014 17:43:43 -0400
From:	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
To:	Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...ulusnetworks.com>
CC:	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>,
	john.r.fastabend@...el.com,
	Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] iproute2 bridge: bring to par with brctl show macs

On 05/27/14 17:41, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:

> filtering by brport is very useful.
> I wasnt as much concerned about that use case because i can already
> filter in user space for brport when i dump (iproute2 does as well).
> But i couldnt filter by bridge since that info is not even
> present in the dumped data
> I just saw the patch posted by Roopa - I think that now gives me the
> ability to also filter by bridge in user space.
>
> Note: All i am doing is stealing the ndm ifindex - which before was
> a zero and ignore by the kernel as the bridge ifindex.
> I think what you are suggesting is: if the user doesnt specify the
> bridge i should use the ndm ifindex to send down the brport as
> the filter. But that becomes an bridge "or" bridgeport filter
> choice. A more useful scenario is to have bridge "and"
> bridgeport filter. So almost seems like i need an attribute to send
> down for the bridge port.
> Sounds like a separate patch...
>

Hrm. I wonder - I could use the NDA_MASTER attribute that Roopa
posted to define the bridge filter. I could then use the ndm ifindex to
define the bridgeport filter.

Thoughts?

cheers,
jamal

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html