| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <538644AE.90807@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 16:18:54 -0400 From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com> To: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: SCTP seems to lose its socket state. On 05/27/2014 11:10 AM, David Laight wrote: > I've been looking at an ethernet trace from one of our customers. > They seem to have got an SCTP socket into a rather confused state. > > There seem to be a significant number of transmit ethernet frames > that don't read the far end. > This shouldn't cause a real problem, but we end up with the following: > This trace was taken on the linux system: > > 39964 0.304473 -> SCTP INIT > 39965 0.292669 <- SCTP INIT (I think this has an invalid checksum) > 39968 0.467935 <- SCTP INIT > 39969 0.000093 -> SCTP INIT_ACK > 39970 0.003947 <- SCTP COOKIE_ECHO > 39971 0.000072 -> SCTP COOKIE_ACK > 39972 0.000337 -> M3UA ASPUP > 39979 0.809659 <- SCTP COOKIE_ECHO cookie_ack was dropped for some reason? > 39980 0.000058 -> SCTP COOKIE_ACK > shutdown() called here - seems to be ignored > 39983 0.949471 <- SCTP COOKIE_ECHO Cookie timer fired and resent the cookie_echo. > 39984 0.000053 -> SCTP COOKIE_ACK > 39986 0.730072 -> M3UA ASPUP Same TSN as above > 40002 0.270589 -> M3UA ASPUP Same TSN as above Hmm.. look like more retransmissions. > 40008 3.689088 <- SCTP HEARTBEAT This probably means that cookie_ack was finally accepted and we are not heart-beating... output of 'cat /proc/net/sctp/assocs' might help. If the local is running a recent enough kernel, then turning on dynamic debug in sctp will also help. > 40009 0.000027 -> SCTP HEARTBEAT_ACK > 40014 0.261152 <- SCTP HEARTBEAT > 40015 0.000033 -> SCTP HEARTBEAT_ACK > 40026 0.123048 <- SCTP HEARTBEAT > 40027 0.000030 -> SCTP HEARTBEAT_ACK > 40036 1.615048 -> M3UA ASPUP Same TSN as above > > There are no signs of any SACKs for the ASPUP, I think they have the > correct TSN (the same value as in the INIT_ACK). Make sure that verification tags match what was negotiated in init/init_ack, and the SSN starts at 0. > No signs of any shutdowns or aborts from either system. > What's strange is that some frames are simply not accepted. Are the nics by any chance ixgbe that has checksum offload and the checksums are corrupt for some reason? -vlad > As seems to be typical for M3UA the source and destination ports are > the same. No additional IP addresses appear in the INIT (etc) messages. > > Some 80 seconds after the start of the above the remote sends us another INIT. > This is responded to (with new verification tags from both ends), but only > SCTP heartbeats get sent/received (both ways). > > The remote sends a few heartbeats with the old verification tag they are > ignored. > > The application is repeatedly trying to connect() - but the requests fail > immediately (errno unknown). > I think the system is RHEL 6.4, kernel: 2.6.32-358.el6.x86_64. > > Does this 'ring any bells' ? > I think I've asked a similar question before - and 2.6.32 was thought > to be a late enough kernel. > It is, of course, possible they are running RHEL 5 on this system. > > I can't think of an easy way to repeat the above sequence to verify > on a much more recent kernel. > > David > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists