[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140530.154857.23436038195529720.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 15:48:57 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp
Cc: stephen@...workplumber.org, vyasevic@...hat.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bridge: Prevent insertion of FDB entry with
disallowed vlan
From: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 15:15:53 +0900
> br_handle_local_finish() is allowing us to insert an FDB entry with
> disallowed vlan. For example, when port 1 and 2 are communicating in
> vlan 10, and even if vlan 10 is disallowed on port 3, port 3 can
> interfere with their communication by spoofed src mac address with
> vlan id 10.
>
> Note: Even if it is judged that a frame should not be learned, it should
> not be dropped because it is destined for not forwarding layer but higher
> layer. See IEEE 802.1Q-2011 8.13.10.
>
> Signed-off-by: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp>
In reference to Vlad's suggestion to try to reuse the logic of the
existing br_allowed_ingress() function, I don't think that's so
easy.
As stated already, it drops packets whilst we don't want that here.
Another difference is that it does vlan_untag(), which we also do
not want here.
Let's just stay with this version of the fix, Vlad if you're OK with
that can you please give your ACK? Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists