[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <538C8892.8030800@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 10:22:10 -0400
From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp
CC: stephen@...workplumber.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bridge: Prevent insertion of FDB entry with disallowed
vlan
On 05/30/2014 06:48 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp>
> Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 15:15:53 +0900
>
>> br_handle_local_finish() is allowing us to insert an FDB entry with
>> disallowed vlan. For example, when port 1 and 2 are communicating in
>> vlan 10, and even if vlan 10 is disallowed on port 3, port 3 can
>> interfere with their communication by spoofed src mac address with
>> vlan id 10.
>>
>> Note: Even if it is judged that a frame should not be learned, it should
>> not be dropped because it is destined for not forwarding layer but higher
>> layer. See IEEE 802.1Q-2011 8.13.10.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp>
>
> In reference to Vlad's suggestion to try to reuse the logic of the
> existing br_allowed_ingress() function, I don't think that's so
> easy.
>
> As stated already, it drops packets whilst we don't want that here.
>
> Another difference is that it does vlan_untag(), which we also do
> not want here.
>
> Let's just stay with this version of the fix, Vlad if you're OK with
> that can you please give your ACK? Thanks.
>
Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>
I need to spend a little time and figure out how to make it more re-usable.
-vlad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists