[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <538F3478.8040108@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 19:00:08 +0400
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>, xen-devel@...ts.xen.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
CC: ian.campbell@...rix.com, zoltan.kiss@...rix.com,
paul.durrant@...rix.com, a.j.bennieston@...il.com,
"Andrew J. Bennieston" <andrew.bennieston@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v10 1/7] xen-netback: Move grant_copy_op array
back into struct xenvif.
Hello.
On 06/04/2014 06:52 PM, David Vrabel wrote:
>>> This array was allocated separately in commit ac3d5ac2 ("xen-netback:
>>> fix guest-receive-side array sizes") due to it being very large, and a
>>> struct xenvif is allocated as the netdev_priv part of a struct
>>> net_device, i.e. via kmalloc() but falling back to vmalloc() if the
>>> initial alloc. fails.
>>> In preparation for the multi-queue patches, where this array becomes
>>> part of struct xenvif_queue and is always allocated through vzalloc(),
>>> move this back into the struct xenvif.
>> Won't this cause an allocation failure and so break bisection at this
>> patch?
> No. As Andrew already said: "...falling back to vmalloc() if the
> initial alloc. fails."
Ah, sorry, I've managed to forget about that part. :-/
> David
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists