[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <539319F6.2090907@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2014 17:56:06 +0400
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: Per Hurtig <per.hurtig@....se>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
CC: eric.dumazet@...il.com, anna.brunstrom@....se,
mohammad.rajiullah@....se, ncardwell@...gle.com,
nanditad@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: fixing TLP's FIN recovery
Hello.
On 07-06-2014 15:10, Per Hurtig wrote:
> Fix to a problem observed when losing a FIN segment that does not
> contain data. In such situations, TLP is unable to recover from
> *any* tail loss and instead adds at least PTO ms to the
> retransmission process, i.e., RTO = RTO + PTO.
You should provide your signoff.
[...]
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
> index d463c35..6573765 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
> @@ -2130,8 +2130,10 @@ void tcp_send_loss_probe(struct sock *sk)
> if (WARN_ON(!skb || !tcp_skb_pcount(skb)))
> goto rearm_timer;
>
> - /* Probe with zero data doesn't trigger fast recovery. */
> - if (skb->len > 0)
> + /* Probe with zero data doesn't trigger fast recovery, if not
s/not/no/?
Or rather "if FIN flag is not set"?
> + * FIN flag is set.
> + */
> + if ((skb->len > 0) || (TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->tcp_flags & TCPHDR_FIN))
> err = __tcp_retransmit_skb(sk, skb);
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists