[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5394E2F2.70301@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2014 15:25:54 -0700
From: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
To: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
CC: davem@...emloft.net, stephen@...workplumber.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, wkok@...ulusnetworks.com,
sfeldma@...ulusnetworks.com, shm@...ulusnetworks.com,
Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2 v3] bridge: Add master device name to bridge
fdb show
On 6/8/14, 8:24 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> On 06/08/14 10:44, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
>
>> sure, you seemed to be using my below patch in your examples for fdb
>> filtering.
>> so thought i should resubmit. I am now ok with either.
>
> Yes, my patch is on top of your earlier (version 1) patch. I preferred
> that version.
ok, yes, i thought so. And this version (v3) is same as v1
>
> I looked at the code a little more after sending that email.
> There is some value in displaying a bridge port's unicast addresses
> and even setting them; but only in the case that the bridge port is
> itself an owner of an fdb. As an example of such a case when you have
> another bridge attached to a bridge as a port; or when you have
> something like a vxlan as a bridge port etc.
> However, current code does not discriminate. I cant make sense of
> why this would be intentional but possibly i am missing some use cases.
>
> cheers,
> jamal
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists