[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140620200758.GB18996@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 16:07:58 -0400
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
Cc: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
s.priebe@...fihost.ag, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [Patch net-next] veth: add netpoll support
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 11:31:30PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 06/20/2014 11:17 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
>
> >It is trivial to add netpoll support to veth, since
> >it is not stacked device, we don't need to setup and cleanup
> >netpoll.
>
> >Reported-by: Stefan Priebe <s.priebe@...fihost.ag>
> >Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
> >Cc: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
> >Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
>
> >---
> >diff --git a/drivers/net/veth.c b/drivers/net/veth.c
> >index b4a10bc..03e781b 100644
> >--- a/drivers/net/veth.c
> >+++ b/drivers/net/veth.c
> >@@ -248,6 +248,13 @@ static void veth_dev_free(struct net_device *dev)
> > free_netdev(dev);
> > }
> >
> >+#ifdef CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER
> >+static void veth_poll_controller(struct net_device *dev)
> >+{
> >+ return;
>
> Not needed.
It is, a valid function poniter is how the stack determines if a given driver
supports netpoll. See the tun_poll_controller for another example
Neil
>
> >+}
> >+#endif /* CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER */
> >+
> > static const struct net_device_ops veth_netdev_ops = {
> > .ndo_init = veth_dev_init,
> > .ndo_open = veth_open,
>
> WBR, Sergei
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists