[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6D1726152D@AcuExch.aculab.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 14:27:49 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Vlad Yasevich' <vyasevich@...il.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org" <linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next] sctp: Add partially support for MSG_MORE to
SCTP.
From: Vlad Yasevich
> On 06/20/2014 12:24 PM, David Laight wrote:
> > If MSG_MORE is set then buffer sends as if Nagle were enabled.
> > The first data chunk is still sent on its own, but subsequent chunks
> > will be bundled and full packets sent.
> > Full MSG_MORE support would require a timeout (preferably configurable
> > per-socket) to send the last chunk(s), instead of sending them
> > when there is nothing outstanding.
> >
>
> Instead of using 1 and 2, can you define them as flags please
Will do....
It is worth inverting nagle/nodelay bit; so that:
0 => SCTP_NODELAY
1 => Nagle (default)
2 => MSG_MORE
4 => reserved for corked
That would require working out where the structure is initialised
(in order to default to Nagle).
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists